Browder all’Heroes of the Dorm

Browder all’Heroes of the Dorm

Profilo di t3hc0rr0d3r

In occasione dell’Heroes of the Dorm 2016 (ormai agli sgoccioli) alcuni redattori di BlizzPro hanno avuto l’occasione di intervistare Dustin Browder, Game Director per Heroes of the Storm, sulle prossime novità che dobbiamo aspettarci (prima o poi) nel Nexus.

Le prime domande non hanno potuto che riguardare ovviamente Tracer, la nuova Eroina presto nel Nexus: l’intervista si è soffermata sul suo particolare meccanismo d’attacco, la ricarica, che interrompe di fatto l’azione dell’Eroina costringendola a sincronizzarsi al meglio con le sue due Abilità di teletrasporto; il fatto inoltre che sin dal primo livello sia presente l’Eroica potrebbe a quanto pare tornare nei prossimi Eroi di Overwatch che vedremo nel Nexus.

In quanto a contenuti, i dev sono a lavoro già su più di una nuova Mappa; bisognerà aspettarsi presto dunque un sistema di rotazione delle Mappe come quello degli Eroi, ma non è detto ancora ogni quanto ruoteranno poi in effetti le Mappe. Il ritorno delle Miniere Infestate è ancora in lavorazione.

Parlando di Mappe viene subito in mente l’Arena: c’è ancora lavoro da fare, non c’è ancora nessun ETA, ma a quanto pare gli sviluppatori vogliono farne un mezzo per una sorta di Tavern Brawls di Heartstone.

Nessun ETA ancora nemmeno per l’attesa Prima Stagione del sistema competitivo: pare sia attualmente in cima alla lista di cose da fare, eppure l’intenzione degli sviluppatori di rilasciare insieme ad essa un grosso aggiornamento all’intero sistema di Ranked e MMR ha allungato (di molto, a quanto pare) i tempi.

Durante l’intervista anche più di una domanda su come il team dedicato al bilanciamento degli Eroi prenda decisioni e lavori; si sono analizzati casi specifici ultimamente molto discussi (Rehgar, ad esempio) e si è parlato dei Vichinghi, prendendo ad esempio ancora una volta i dati di Hotslogs (nonostante, diciamo noi, la sua frequente inaffidabilità, NdR).

Di seguito l’intervista completa:

So Tracer is coming out soon and she has some interesting mechanics as far as her reload and her ultimate at level one. Are those going to be design themes that might carry over to future Overwatch Heroes?

It could be. That could totally happen, but I don’t know that it has to. We sort of see each character on a case by case basis. If we have opportunities to do stuff with other Overwatch Heroes because it makes sense we will. We talked to the Overwatch guys quite a bit about if they had other Ultimate abilities designed for their Heroes that they didn’t use that we might pull those in. Tracer, they had ideas, but they didn’t really work as well in our game so we didn’t go that route. It’s definitely possible that we use these mechanics again, but we are not planning it that way.

The whole goal on Hero design is to try to keep the doors as open as possible for the designers working on the problem so that they can really push the boundaries. We try not to put any boxes on them. It’s weird as designers. Designers are often looking for rules that they can apply so that they know they have been successful. So they will actually put themselves in a box if you let them. So what we will often do is say, “You know you don’t have to do that”, “But we have just done that with the last three Heroes”, “But maybe you just shouldn’t”, “Oh, is that right?”, “Maybe, I don’t know, but think about it.”. We try to get them to blow the doors off of what is required. We often encourage these guys to reconsider what if you did this, what if you did that. It leads to a much more creative environment and they do some really fun things as a result and everyone hopefully gets different Heroes as a result of pushing them like that.

Now it’s interesting you say that because when the first few Diablo characters came out they all had some type of gathering mechanic, like Butcher with his meat. Is that connected, do you feel like put yourself in that box and had to break out, or was it just a coincidence?

No, I think it was just a coincidence. It was the nature of a lot of Diablo characters not having a regular mana cost. Characters like Sonja the Barbarian, she should be using Fury. That’s what she should be using.

The Butcher we were trying to do something to make him feel more selfish. To make him feel like this guy is not really with you 100%, like he’s got his own needs, and so that kind of fell out of that need.

Azmodan has mana, but he obviously has a Talent that everybody loves to take, but that was also at a time that we didn’t know how popular that Talent would be. It didn’t seem like it was core to his kit, but it has become that, but that wasn’t really how we set out to make him.

With Tracer it seems like you’ve done a great job of capturing that Overwatch flavor and putting it directly into Heroes. What kind of challenges did the reload mechanic present balance wise?

The reload mechanic was actually really good for her, almost right away, because it allowed us to give her this ferocious burst in her auto attack. The way an auto attack naturally works is that it is going to have to dribble out over time. You can do weird stuff like we did with Tychus where for a time he had the spin up mechanic. The reload on Tracer introduced a break in the damage, which means that all of that damage that would have been there during the break gets shoved into that clip so she can just burst and stop. So now her auto attack feels like it synergizes with her Blink and Recall, which felt great. That’s not really what it’s about in Overwatch. Everyone has reload in Overwatch, but for our game it really works, but I don’t know if we would do the same thing for another Hero going forward. I don’t know if we did Reaper if you would need a reload mechanic for him. That may not be the case, but for her, because it synergizes so well with the Blink, it really worked well with her kit. It made her feel really natural, like what she wanted to do, hit and run.

One of the big questions from the community involves MMR and Season One. Do you have any updates as far as where we are on those things?

I don’t have a date for you. It is the highest thing on our list at this moment, to get that season rolled on and we want to do a Ranked Play update as well.

Do you feel like those items are connected or could we possible see one before the other?

They are connected for us right now, and I’ll tell you one of the reasons we did that.

We are always looking to the game down the road. We knew we wanted to update our Ranked play system because a lot of people weren’t happy with it, and we weren’t happy with it either. We agreed with the feedback. We knew that if we did a season roll, and then we changed how ranked worked from top to bottom we would have to maintain both systems in the UI forever. For the next ten or twenty years. You wouldn’t want it to be where Season One, or Preseason is no longer visible. “What do you mean it’s not visible? We got sick of maintaining both so we just dropped one.” We didn’t want to do that so they became connected in our minds. Considering how long it has taken us to do the revamp I kind of wish we hadn’t done that, but we did. So we are in this place now where we are going way too long on the Season One roll, but we are going to do revamp on the ranked as a result, so those things are married together.

Is there more polish to the draft UI coming because there have been concerns from the community that it is really hard to differentiate certain Heroes and skins?

I’ve heard the feedback and I don’t disagree with the feedback. I’d have to talk to the UI team, I haven’t gotten an update from them as far as how they would like to address that.

Along those lines, could we potentially see who is in a party on the draft screen?

We could. I haven’t heard that as loudly, but I am not fundamentally opposed to it.

I’m curious about how maps will be introduced in the future. Is there any type of schedule, or is it “we are going to make a new map when we have a cool idea,” or around launching of other games? We had the two for Diablo, is there anything coming for Starcraft or Legion?

We definitely want to do some new stuff, we’re definitely going to do more Battlegrounds. We do have more we are working on right now. We are trying to do everything we can to push the boundaries of the Battlegrounds so that you have to think about your Hero and Talent picks as differently as you can. It is tough with internal testing to determine what will actually cause that to happen. We have seen these maps like Towers of Doom, where the more different they are from one another the more likely those things are to occur. We find it difficult to actually engineer a specific thing, or we haven’t gotten to that point yet. We haven’t said, “Let’s just build a map for Specialists and everyone else is screwed.” We haven’t really done that, but we have done stuff like with Immortals, and skeletons, and Towers of Doom, where we just try to think outside the box. Things to make you think about the game a little differently, and that’s our big goal going forward. I don’t know which maps are coming next exactly, but we have a bunch in the pipe and we are going to keep working.

We will probably go to a rotation system at some point, because we are getting too many now. I’d be interested to get your feedback on it. I’ve heard monthly, I’ve heard weekly, I’ve heard every two weeks. I kind of want to tie it to Hero rotation so that you know that every week things are a little bit different. We are looking through the maps and trying to identify them as maps of types and making sure that there is a good spread at any given week, or month, or whatever the rotation cycle is. If I’ve got Garden Terror and I’ve got Dragon Shire, those don’t show up in the same week because you have some similarities. Maybe that’s a bad example, but like Sky Temple and Blackheart’s Bay. Maybe those aren’t back to back so that there is a lot of variation in experience. I was thinking about six maps because we’ve done tests in the past and six was about right. I felt pretty good, as far as having enough variation over an evening of play. Not so few that I know what is coming next, and not so many that we get no value out of rotation. I feel like that’s the way we’re headed.  That’s our thinking right now and I’d love to hear feedback from you guys or from players.

Do you think about revisiting Haunted Mines?

Actually, we have a plan. I don’t know when it is going to happen, but the map guys have a plot. They are like, “Here’s what we are going to do. We are going to fix it by doing these things.” I have actually forgotten what it was, but every time they pitch it too me I am like, “Yeah, yeah! That sounds great.” So they have a plan and the plan seems sound as to how they are going to fix it, but we’ll have to put it together and test it to see how it goes.

I think there is a reasonable amount of passion for Haunted Mines specifically, and to see some updates to it that let it return to the game. We’ll take a swing at it one more time and see what happens.

What did you guys learn from Rehgar because he came out with that total rework then for five weeks straight you had to quote unquote nerf him?

It’s not quote unquote, a nerf is a nerf (laughter). You’d really have to get a balance designer for that, I’m sorry I don’t have a better answer for you. I know they are always getting a lot of knowledge out of these Heroes.

Nova has been in a similar boat. We thought we maybe made her too powerful, but that wasn’t the case, and she has received some buffs since then.

We are always getting more information as far as what works. We are not in a position where we are giving the balance team the same kind of time we give the Starcraft 2 balance team to do their jobs. There is simply too much content coming too quickly, and they don’t have quite that level of authority. On Starcraft we would kill great ideas because we were concerned about balance. Like really fun things, but we would be like, nope. And Starcraft is small, it was built to be tight and it’s built around that. Heroes is a little bit more built to be like, “Yeah!…and keep it balanced.” We make their lives very difficult as a result. We’re still open to feedback on it. At the same time I’ve been encouraging them that the community wants to see changes to these Heroes a little more frequently that we have been able to do. To wait seven months for a Gazlowe update isn’t right. You’re going to have to put things out a little bit live and see what happens and they’ve been doing that more.

Along those lines, is there a concern of balance between changing Heroes quickly enough and kind of punishing players who have to relearn that Hero?

Brightwing is the best example of that I think. I think Brightwing players are still mad.

It’s definitely a concern. We do have Heroes that we feel like are badly designed. The game has evolved and we just know so much more about Hero design than we knew back when we created them. The balance designers are like, “There is no number that I can put on that Talent that will be remotely fun for anybody to take. You’re going to have to give me a new Talent there.” When we get to those places we need to give them the freedom to make those fixes and if it makes players angry we have to suffer through that. Not because we want to make players angry, but because the overall health of the game has to be there. There is certainly a cost. I do not want to trivialize the cost in any way. I’ve had Heroes change under me and it’s not a great feeling. If the Hero is long term more part of the experience as a result, I think it is a risk we have to take. We just have to be very careful about it and know going in that we are about to do this. Should we message it early? What can we do to minimize the cost to the player who has really mastered this Hero?

How does the Dev team balance the concern of making the changes that you feel you need to made in what you feel is a timely fashion with the different eSports events since they come up so frequently?

Some things we can do. We can ban out a Hero if we feel like something has gone off the rails and just say, “I’m sorry this ones off the table for all,” like we are going to do with Kael’thas today. Sometimes we are on a slightly older build, like we were on in Korea, and that gives benefits.

I would like to see us have more tools in this area. I don’t feel like we have all the tools we need for a fully thriving eSport and a game that is changing as fast as this game is. I would love to see us have a tournament environment that we’re in that is fire walled off and is on some much older version of the game that we all know is safe and viable. Or something, I don’t even know if that is the right answer. It is the go to answer in my head, but there may be a better answer than that. Something that gets the tournament scene out of this state of insanity, because it is going very quickly.

We also say that a brand new Hero can’t be played for two weeks in the pro scene. We could extend that if we needed too. We could say, “No, I’m sorry it’s a month.” I don’t have any problem with that. We are not using the pro scene to sell Heroes. We can delay them as much as we need to. We feel like that is a reasonable time right now, but I am on board with extending it if that’s the feedback. If we see something happen with a new Hero that is disruptive, we could boot it further. I’d be interested in hearing from the pros. The last time we talked to them they felt like two weeks was fine, but that could change.

There is a tool out now that lets you display MMR on the loading screen. Is that something that you are concerned about or what are your thoughts on it? Is it against the Terms of Service?

It’s a really difficult question because I don’t actually know what that is really doing. I haven’t decoded it.

If it is doing anything bad at all it could be against our ULA, and if you are modifying the game it could be against our ULA. Am I personally angry if all it’s doing is showing the MMR from HOTSlogs? I don’t care, it’s fine. But I don’t know exactly what it’s doing so I can’t say if you use that tool you won’t get banned because I don’t actually know what is going on. I am not upset at having MMR on the screen because what is the difference between that and a second monitor? It’s exactly the same. But again I don’t actually know what is going on under the hood and if we found out that program was modifying game data or something else then, yeah you might be in a bad spot running that tool. If it’s really doing nothing like that then we don’t care. It’s fine, just be careful and don’t download #@%.

We’ve had Questing Talents live now for a couple of weeks. You were very excited to roll them out. How do you feel like they are progressing with all this new data and are they something you are still excited to roll out to new Heroes? Can we expect Tracer to have Questing Talents?

I don’t know that I have seen all the data on them yet and I don’t know if I would take that data seriously after the first couple of weeks.

We are still excited about Questing Talents.

I don’t remember how many Questing Talents Tracer has, I was mostly playing against her in play testing.

We will do more Questing Talents in Heroes going forward. We are looking at doing some improvements to the Questing Talent UI so that it is a little more obvious and you can see what’s going on. So you can see what’s going on with enemy Hero Talents. We feel like it adds a lot of bumps in the road towards player power level and adds more uncertainly. I don’t just have to look at the top of the screen and go, “Seventeen, I know everything.”

I feel like Questing Talents, if done properly, can do quite a bit for the game and we are going to continue to invest in them in terms of UI and across the system. We are going to keep watching them for sure.

How are Arenas progressing?

We are still working on it. We want to move more towards a Tavern Brawl style with it where there is a lot of different stuff in there, and there are rotations in there, and we are doing different things.

We put out the ARAM map with the last patch. We feel like that was cool. It was really fun. I really enjoyed playing on it. That was a really great example where the community was already doing that on Cursed Hollow. One of the map designers came in and said, “They are doing this thing, and I can do this in a week.” I’m like, “Nothing on this team happens in a week. You’re crazy.” He went around to all of the art guys and negotiated this really quick launch of this battleground. There were some concerns, but we decided we are just going to do it, and it is going to be awesome. I felt like it was a really good collaboration from the community and this one developer and the people he rallied behind him. Will we add a matchmaker to it at some point? I certainly hope so. I hope it can go into Arena or go somewhere into the game that is more formal. Maybe what we have is enough, but I don’t think so. I think we can do better, but we got it into people’s hands and they are getting to play with it and have a good time. We are trying to do that a little more often.

In these eSports events the Heroes Trailers are often used as commercials. Are those still in the process?

We’re still going to do them, we just aren’t going to do as many as we did. The Hero Overviews were way more watched that the Hero Trailers were, and they were also way easier to make and players liked them better. We are going to do a lot more Hero Overviews but we will definitely do some lore pieces too. We’re just not going to do one for every Hero. We’re going to do them when it feels like it makes sense.

Are there any changes coming to Lost Vikings? I am concerned about their win rate on HOTSlogs.

You think it is too high? I don’t know that we are going to nerf because they are so hard to play.

There is a goal that we have talked about, which I think is interesting, is can we make a version of Vikings that is not a three split Vikings. So that we set it up so that you have to play Vikings in one lane and it works, and you’re not allowed to split. Like you can split, but only Baelog collects experience or only Olaf collects experience. So you have to keep them together and there is no reason to split. If we can make a version where you keep them together that is fun, then more players will be able to play them.

We don’t think they see enough play to warrant a nerf.

Attacco DDoS a Blizzard: problemi di connessione nel server americano

Attacco DDoS a Blizzard: problemi di connessione nel server americano

Profilo di VinCesare

Una situazione problematica si è verificata questa notte sui server di Blizzard ed ha portato grosse difficoltà a tutti i giocatori del server americano. Si tratta di un attacco DDoS che ha paralizzato i servizi dell’azienda di Irvine nel Nuovo Continente.

Per i meno avvezzi alla terminologia informatica, gli attacchi DDoS (Distributed Denial of Service) sono pratiche informatiche (di hacker) in grado di affollare i server delle aziende con un elevatissimo traffico di dati limitando o paralizzando del tutto i normali servizi.

Potete immaginare come questa pratica abbiamo interrotto il normale afflusso di dati sulla piattaforma Battle.Net. Il problema, però, è stato limitato solamente sul server americano, ma ha comunque provocato una marea di disservizi a migliaia di giocatori.

Molti soffrivano enorme latenza, mentre molti altri sono stati disconnessi senza possibilità di rientrare nei loro giochi preferiti per almeno un’ora, quando Blizzard ha annunciato di aver risolto il problema dell’attacco DDoS ed ha richiesto di riprovare a rientrare in game.

Per almeno un’altra ora, però, i giocatori hanno avuto problemi. Ma pian piano le cose sembrano esser rientrate e tutti i servizi ripartiti con la solita regolarità. Non si conoscono ancora i motivi di questo attacco DDoS, evento che non accade con frequenza elevata

Il tweet ufficiale

Che ne pensate di questa situazione? Avete avuto problemi sul server americano per l’attacco DDoS a Blizzard? Fateci sapere la vostra…

Articoli Correlati:

“Bobby Kotick avrebbe affrettato la vendita a Microsoft per evitare responsabilità”. NYC cita in giudizio Activision

“Bobby Kotick avrebbe affrettato la vendita a Microsoft per evitare responsabilità”. NYC cita in giudizio Activision

Profilo di VinCesare

Tiene ancora banco la questione “molestie sessuali” in casa Activision Blizzard e stavolta ci va di mezzo anche la nuova acquisizione da parte di Microsoft. Ad essere però sotto accusa sono Activision Blizzard e soprattutto il suo CEO Bobby Kotick.

Stavolta a citare in giudizio l’azienda ci pensa direttamente la città di New York, o meglio alcune delle maggiori entità del pubblico settore, tra cui pompieri, poliziotti ed insegnanti. I gruppi di lavoratori menzionati (che posseggono alcuni stock di Activision), alla Corte di Cancelleria del Delaware, avrebbero chiesto di visionare alcuni documenti e libri dell’azienda per controllare eventuali trasgressioni. Per loro, diverse mosse dell’azienda starebbero danneggiando il valore della compagnia.

Si crede infatti che durante l’acquisizione  da parte di Microsoft ci sia stato qualche comportamento non proprio lecito, soprattutto da parte di Bobby Kotick, il quale avrebbe affrettato la vendita di Activision per poter fugare ogni sua responsabilità dai recenti problemi dell’azienda.

Nel frattempo, però, il CEO avrebbe comunque continuato a servire come esecutivo per l’azienda. Nel documento pubblicato dalla corte, si parla anche di soldi, con cifre precise. Kotick avrebbe avuto in mano la totale libertà decisionale di trattare la vendita. Dalle affermazioni contenute nel documento emergerebbe però l’idea secondo la quale Kotick sarebbe stato inadatto ad avere questo tipo di potere.

Ma comunque, senza nessuna autorizzazione e nessuna offerta da parte di Microsoft, Bobby Kotick avrebbe proposto agli acquirenti un range di prezzo tra i 90 ed i 105 dollari per azione. Microsoft, a quel punto, avrebbe offerto 90$ per azione, arrivando quindi a “sottovalutare” il reale valore.

Insomma anche la questione acquisizione nasconderebbe più di qualche ombra, come insinuerebbe il documento dell’accusa. Non ci resta che attendere ulteriori informazioni, con la speranza di scoprire il prima possibile la realtà dei fatti, per donare dignità a questa storica azienda.

FONTE: Axios

Che ne pensate? Fateci sapere la vostra…

Articoli Correlati:

Activision Blizzard, caso molestie: il governatore della California Gavin Newsom accusato di ingerenze

Activision Blizzard, caso molestie: il governatore della California Gavin Newsom accusato di ingerenze

Profilo di VinCesare

È da tempo ormai che tiene banco il triste caso di “sexual harrasment” nell’azienda Activision Blizzard: molti gli eventi sotto accusa. Le investigazioni sono state molteplici per mano del California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH).

E proprio per queste investigazioni che è sotto accusa il Governatore della California Gavin Newsom per aver interferito nelle indagini. Il governatore sembrerebbe il responsabile di ben due licenziamenti nel DFEH.

Secondo quanto riportato da Bloomerg, Janette Wipper sarebbe stata licenziata dal suo ruolo di primo consigliere dell’agenzia. Ad unirsi a lei è stata la sua collega Melanie Proctor, avvocatessa del DFEH, indotta a rassegnare le dimissioni.

Con un’email Proctor avrebbe riferito delle “interferenze” di Newsom nel caso Activision Blizzard. Avrebbe anche affermato: “L’Ufficio del Governatore richiedeva ripetutamente notizie anticipate sulle strategie della controversia e sui suoi prossimi step. Come noi continuavamo a vincere in tribunale, così  l’interferenza cresceva, simulando gli interessi del consiglio di Activision.

Nel mentre, Janette Wipper sta “valutando tutte le strade di un possibile ricorso legale” ed, invece, Erin Mellon, portavoce di Newsom, ha definito le accuse al Governatore “false categoricamente“.

Il caso è molto delicato: in attesa di ulteriori riscontri ufficiali, qual è il vostro parere? Fateci sapere la vostra…