Hearthstone per i nuovi giocatori ha bisogno di diverse migliorie…in una modalità più casual i nuovi giocatori riescono a giocare ed a godersi l’esperienza della locanda abbastanza bene ma in ranked non si riesce ad ottenere lo stesso beneficio.
Questa è l’impressione di Ben Brode che ha fatto sapere che il team non è assolutamente soddisfatto di  come la ladder funzioni e che stanno lavorando per cercare una soluzione.

Hey there!
We agree that the new player experience needs more work. We’ve been tweaking it for years and have seen significant increases in retention among new players since launch. Most new players start playing against the AI and then take on other players in Casual. The Casual matchmaker has gone through a lot of iteration and new player winrates have increased by ~15%.

Ranked is a different story. Ranked is becoming more difficult for new players over time. I spoke about some of the challenges we are currently facing with our ladder system before I left for paternity leave here: [See quote below – Ben on Ladder]

Something you may not realize is that new players actually play in a seperate matchmaking pool for their first several sessions. In Casual, we match them entirely against other brand new players with similarly-sized collections.

That all said, we think the introductory missions up through Illidan feel pretty good, and after that it still feels like a bit of a cliff. It’s definitely something we’re aware of. Thanks for your feedback, and for the feedback of everyone else who’s been chiming in on this over the last few months.

Il fatto che non siano contenti al 100% con il sistema della ladder è da ricondurre principalmente al fatto che questa e’ troppo “grinding”.
Il team inoltre non è affatto contento se si considera il fatto che i giocatori di rank 18 o più alto siano praticamente nella top 50% del totale di Hearthstone…questo perché essere al rank 18 non fa assolutamente sentire un player nella “metà” alta della popolazione di gioco e quindi c’è palesemente qualcosa che non va tra l’esperienza di gioco ed il valore reale che la performance di un giocatore ha.

Seeing some comments here about how people are enjoying easier laddering due to this bug, and hoping we leave it unfixed. I thought I might chime in and talk about the ladder a bit, and hopefully get some feedback!
We have been discussing the ladder system a lot recently – we’re not 100% happy with it.

Here are some things we are currently discussing:

Rank 18 players are higher ranked than 50% of HS players. That number doesn’t make you feel like you are in the top 50%, and that’s a missed opportunity. We try and counter this by telling you all over the place what the mapping is to the rest of the population, but it’d be better if expectations and reality matched here.

We’ve received feedback that the last-minute jostling for high Legend ranks at the end of a season doesn’t feel all that great.

We’ve received feedback that the ladder can feel like a grind.

We are reanalyzing the number of ranks, the number of stars per rank, the number of bonus stars given out at the start of the season, and other parts of the system.

We are developing simulation systems that let us predict what changes to the ladder would do to the population curve. If we inflate too many stars, the whole population ends up in the Legend bucket and while that might feel great for a single month, the entire system falls apart eventually. People who played waaaay back may remember when “3-star master” was the pinnacle of achievement, and it meant nothing because so many people ended up in that bucket. With better simulation tools, we are planning on trying a lot of crazy things. Iteration is important in design, and getting the tools to iterate quickly is very important.

Something I want to emphasize is that while I think we can improve the ladder, the metric for that improvement isn’t necessarily any one player’s individual rank increasing. Players want the better rewards (and prestige) associated with high ranks, or the Legend card back, so any change we make that increases the chances of those are likely to be perceived as “good”, at least for the short term. But part of what makes the ranked ladder compelling is that exists to rank players. If you want to see how you stack up, ranked is the place to do it. So while some inflation might improve the experience, we need to be careful and make sure we end up with a system that makes people feel rewarded for increases in personal skill or for finding a new deck that breaks the meta.

Cosa ne pensate di questo fatto? La discussione è aperta!